| RSO (n=22) | PRC (n=11) | p-value |
Age | 33.5 ± 14.2 years | 55.4 ± 14.9 years | 0.001 |
Mean Follow-up | 12.5 ± 3.8 years | 6.8 ± 5.2 years | 0.008 |
PRWE | 28.5 ± 23.6 | 43.2 ± 31.9 | 0.22 |
QuickDASH | 19.8 ± 18.1 | 22.3 ± 16.1 | 0.71 |
Satisfaction Score/10 | 8.8 ± 1.5 | 6.5 ± 4.1 | 0.35 |
Revision Surgery | 3 | 2 | 1.0 |
Patients reported high satisfaction and good long-term patient reported outcomes with RSO (Table 1). These cases were compared to a cohort of 15 patients who underwent PRC. Though outcomes between the two groups were not statistically different, the RSO group had lower PRWE scores and higher satisfaction scores.
Range of motion and grip strength were similar among the two groups (Table 2). Given the small sample size, our comparisons are likely underpowered.
Table 2: Post operative ROM percent compared to unaffected side
| RSO | PRC | p-value |
Flexion (%) | 72.9 | 70.4 | 0.83 |
Extension (%) | 75.7 | 76.8 | 0.90 |
Grip strength (%) | 64.9 | 87.0 | 0.61 |
Conclusion
Radial shortening osteotomy in Stage IIIa and IIIb Kienbock's results in good long-term patient reported outcomes. It has a low complication rate, does not eliminate future surgical options and patients report high satisfaction over 10 years from surgery. Although the statistical comparisons in this study are underpowered and we cannot report if RSO offers an advantage to PRC, we conclude that RSO should be considered as a treatment modality even in more advanced disease before considering salvage procedures.