Back to Annual Meeting Posters

Introduction: Distal radius fractures (DRF) are a common injury in the A&E departments, being a major cause of disability of the upper extremity. The aim of this prospective study is to assess the possible association between objective physical variables such as wrist range of movement (ROM), radiological parameters, and upper extremity disability (measured by the DASH questionnaire), after conservative treatment of DRF.

Patients and Methods: 44 patients with non-operatively managed DRF were enrolled in a prospective cohort study from July 2007 till September 2009.

Inclusion criteria: unilateral DRF in skeletally mature patients, treated non-operatively with closed reduction and cast. Patients who sustained a previous fracture of the wrist, or bilateral wrist fracture, or with dementia, were excluded.

After the closed reduction and inmovilization of the fracture in the A&E department we asked the patients to complete the DASH questionnaire, referring to their baseline pre-fracture state.

All fractures were classified according to the AO classification.

After one year, 36 patients were still available for follow-up purposes. We assesed the following objective physical variables: ROM of both wrists: flexion/extension arch and pronation/supination arch. We recorded the following radiologic parameters: radial angulation, volar angulation and radial shortening. The patient-perceived results were measured by the DASH questionnaire, while pain was measured using the VAS scale.

Statistical analysis was performed using the SPSS 15.0.

Results: Average follow up: 13,39 months (range 12.3-16.43). Mean age: 62.5 years (18-91). 75% of the fractures were 23A and 24,1% 23B. Average pre-fracture DASH score was 19.6 and 42.1 at the end of follow-up. Radial tilt: 18.18º. Volar tilt: 3,35º. Radial shortening: 5,76mm. ROM for flexion/extension of the involved wrist: 103.6º and non-involved wrist: 131.2º. ROM for pronation/supination involved wrist: 145.7º and non-involved wrist: 173.8º. Post-fracture VAS score: 3.5.

We didn’t find any significant statistical correlation between the lost of ROM, neither with radiological malaligment nor with patient-perceived outcomes. But we found a significant association between items 24-28 of the DASH (except item 26) questionnaire and the VAS score.

Conclusions: The results of the present study show that, conservative treatment of DRF seems to deteriorate the patient self-reported outcomes measured by the DASH questionnaire.